Logo

Legal / Probate Research

How a Probate Research Firm 4x'd Its Case Capacity With AI Lead Scoring

The firm's edge was judgment about which estates were worth pursuing — expert work that capped throughput at 70 leads a week no matter how hard the team pushed. We encoded the judgment.

70 → 250

Leads reviewed per week

500+ hrs

Manual research eliminated per year

87%

Scoring accuracy vs expert judgment

4

Additional deals closed

The problem

An heir-hunting firm — probate research — depended on manually researching estates to judge which cases were worth pursuing. Slow, expert-dependent work that capped throughput at about 70 leads a week regardless of effort.

Every lead the team did not have time to read was a case that simply never got evaluated.

What we built

  1. 1An Airtable-based probability-scoring system that evaluates and ranks each estate lead.
  2. 2Legal API integration pulling the records the scoring depends on.

The results

  • Capacity: 70 → 250 leads per week, a 4x increase
  • 500+ hours a year of manual research eliminated
  • 87% scoring accuracy measured against expert judgment
  • 4 additional deals closed from cases that would never have been reviewed

Why it worked

The firm's edge was its judgment about which estates pay off. Encoding that judgment into a scoring model meant it could be applied to every lead instead of only the ones the team had hours to read. The 87% accuracy figure is the important one — it is what made the team willing to trust the ranking.

Related case studies

Want a case study like this for your business?

Book a call and we'll map your workflows and rank them by what each one costs you in senior time.

Book a call →